![]() “Kids are clearly deterred from participating by the stigma. In 2012, just 72% of eligible students in California participated in free or reduced lunch programs. ![]() But because of stigma, many eligible students choose not to eat the school’s lunch. Many countries, including Finland, India, Brazil, Japan, have seen their children become healthier and more responsible as a result.ġ5 ways to practice self-care in the time of coronavirusĬhildren whose families can’t afford to pack a lunch or to pay the standard price for one from the cafeteria have the option of free and reduced-price lunch- 29.4 million kids got fed this way at 100,000 schools in 2019, costing the federal government $14.1 billion. Kids who have access to lunch at school perform better academically and have better long-term health outcomes (pdf). ![]() ![]() ![]() There’s little question that such a program would benefit students. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |